|
Vulnerable
in Hearts - a Memoir of Fathers, Sons and Contract Bridge
By Sandy Balfour
(Atlantic
Books, 2003)
Even
at its best the father-son relationship is never a satisfactory
one. There are many reasons for this but at bottom lies the
single observation that a father holds all the trumps. While
a son has only one father - to whom he looks in reverence
during the formative years - a father may have many children,
wives, mistresses and other pressing entanglements to distract
him. Yet it is the father who chooses where his son should
live, where he should be schooled and holidayed, how and for
what he should be punished or rewarded, and in which moral
soil his tastes, enthusiasms and prejudices should be bedded.
Any relationship built on a foundation as lopsided as this
is bound to crack - but we mustn’t repine. That fathers
and sons should grate incessantly against one another is a
healthy function of the evolutionary machine, as natural as
a snake disagreeing with its skin, and those caponised sons
(I have met one or two) who call their fathers their “best
friends” must be branded a menace to the species whose
pathetic destiny lies at the blocked end of an evolutionary
cul-de-sac.
Sandy
Balfour is not such a son but he is one of a growing breed
among young male writers to recognize the literary value of
exploring his own father-son experience. But what lifts this
book above the level of most run-of-the-mill daddy-logues
is the author’s deft weaving together of a poignant
family memoir and a social history of contract bridge. The
idea might seem odd but taking a simple plot about human relations
and mixing it in with some form of connoisseur obsession is
now quite a fashionable technique. It was what made the film
Sideways (a love story involving a couple’s passion
for wine) such a hit, and was also the secret to the success
of Sandy Balfour’s previous book, Pretty Girl in Crimson
Rose (8), in which the author set ruminations about his own
life, his move to Great Britain from South Africa, his fatherhood,
his girlfriend etc., in the context of a manic obsession with
cryptic crossword puzzles.
Like
all books by sons about their fathers this one is a little
sad. The author never really gets to know his dad, a Scotch
chemical engineer from Pietermaritzburg, as the old man won’t
have heart-to-heart conversations, nor does he often look
his son in the eye. Where father and son do find common ground
however is in their shared obsession for bridge. If at first
the son’s impulse is simply to gain his father’s
attention and respect, relentless rubbers over many years
eventually lead him to some kind of understanding of his father’s
veiled nature. He needs to dominate, to feel in control, as
Sandy eventually comes to realize “Dad only ever found
his self belief at the bridge table. Away from it he shrank,
not completely but noticeably.” His nature found its
truest expression when the “the square yard of freedom”
was before him and he could hog the centre game by bidding
aggressively in to captain all the hands even if it meant
“going down.”
But
the relationship nevertheless remained, as they all do, a
one-sided affair. A deathbed guided tour of his father’s
cancer-ridden body including a scar the length of his abdomen,
a hole in his side for a colostomy bag and an amputated penis,
did nothing to draw the two together and although Sandy wept
at his father’s death he and his brother also felt a
strange need to celebrate.
To
enjoy Vulnerable in Hearts the reader probably needs knowledge
of the rudiments of contract bridge. It might also help if
he or she has already experienced something of the kind that
Sandy Balfour describes. I remember well my own father at
the bridge table. He always had a “sticky” by
his side – usually Punt e Mes or Crème de Menthe
- and with the fingers of his left hand (those that were left
after he had shot one of them off) he drummed irritatingly
on the table. In both the bidding and the playing of the hand
he cheated remorselessly, telling his partner. “Don’t
you have a higher card than that? “If you have two aces
say 'Five Hearts'. Do you have two aces?” I once withdrew
from the table because he was cheating so much I could bear
it no longer. So he called me “priggish” - my
behaviour he said was “an affront to morality.”
Generally I adored my father, but I can’t say I liked
him very much on these occasions. Unlike Sandy Balfour I cannot
therefore recommend contract bridge as a patch to the abominable
father-son predicament. I can, however, recommend his engaging
new book - a fresh, engrossing memoir and a masterful advertisement
for the game.
|
|